indexado en
- Base de datos de revistas académicas
- Abrir puerta J
- Genamics JournalSeek
- Claves Académicas
- DiarioTOCs
- Infraestructura Nacional de Conocimiento de China (CNKI)
- CiteFactor
- cimago
- Directorio de publicaciones periódicas de Ulrich
- Biblioteca de revistas electrónicas
- Búsqueda de referencia
- Universidad Hamdard
- EBSCO AZ
- OCLC-WorldCat
- Catálogo en línea SWB
- Biblioteca Virtual de Biología (vifabio)
- Publón
- miar
- Comisión de Becas Universitarias
- Fundación de Ginebra para la Educación e Investigación Médica
- pub europeo
- Google Académico
Enlaces útiles
Comparte esta página
Folleto de diario
Revistas de acceso abierto
- Administración de Empresas
- Agricultura y Acuicultura
- Alimentación y Nutrición
- Bioinformática y Biología de Sistemas
- Bioquímica
- Ciencia de los Materiales
- Ciencia general
- Ciencias Ambientales
- Ciencias Clínicas
- Ciencias farmacéuticas
- Ciencias Médicas
- Ciencias Veterinarias
- Enfermería y Cuidado de la Salud
- Genética y Biología Molecular
- Ingeniería
- Inmunología y Microbiología
- Neurociencia y Psicología
- Química
Abstracto
Study to Determine Bioequivalence of Three Ceftiofur Crystalline Free Acid in Pigs
Luis Ocampo-Camberos, Minerva Monroy-Barreto, Agustín Nieto-Carmona, Juan Angel Jaime, Lilia Gutierrez
Background: Antimicrobial resistance has the potential to affect sustainable development goals in food-producing livestock. Poor quality antibacterial pharmaceutical preparations significantly contribute to heighten this problem. Bioequivalence (BE) studies are very important for the development of dependable pharmaceutical preparations.
Methods: In this trial 3 Ceftiofur Crystalline Free Acid (CCFA) pharmaceutical preparations (1 reference and 2 experimental), intended for swine medicine and freely sold in Mexico, were tested to assess as to whether or not they can be regarded as generic ones.
Results: Three commercially available products of CCFA containing 200 mg of ceftiofur crystalline free acid were compared taking Excede® brand as reference preparation and preparations A and B as experimental ones. Thirty-six Landrace/Duroc pigs randomly divided into three groups received a single injection in phase 1 and after a washout period the same procedure was repeated in a crossover phase. Based on PK data obtained through HPLC analytical recollection of serum concentrations of ceftiofur, it is possible to conclude that preparations A and B cannot be regarded as bioequivalent to Excede® in pigs given that AUC0-168, MRT and K½el values obtained from preparations A and B are statistically different beyond a 20% limit from the corresponding ones obtained for the reference preparation, with confidence intervals >0.05.
Conclusion: Based on the area under the concentration vs time curve from zero to 168 h, mean residence time, and elimination constant values obtained from preparations A and B it is possible to conclude that they cannot be regarded as bioequivalent to Excede® in pigs (CI>0.05).